Back Home About Us Contact Us
Town Charters
Seniors
Federal Budget
Ethics
Hall of Shame
Education
Unions
Binding Arbitration
State - Budget
Local - Budget
Prevailing Wage
Jobs
Health Care
Referendum
Eminent Domain
Group Homes
Consortium
TABOR
Editorials
Tax Talk
Press Releases
Find Representatives
Web Sites
Media
CT Taxpayer Groups
 
Home
Malloy’s Approval Rating Sinks to 38%

Malloy’s Approval Rating Sinks to 38%! Wisconsin Governor Wins State Supreme Court Case to End Collective Bargaining!  

 

 

By Susan Kniep, The Federation of Connecticut Taxpayer Organizations

Visit the Federation’s Website at http://ctact.org/

 

June 25, 2011

 

 

As Governor Malloy’s approval rating sinks to 38% as announced today through the Quinnipiac poll,  Wisconsin’s Governor Scott Walker accomplished a major victory for taxpayers through the State Supreme Court’s ruling this week giving him the authority to end the collective bargaining rights of State employee unions.

 

In contrast, Connecticut’s Governor Dan Malloy, the self-proclaimed Son of Organized Labor, continues to allow State employee unions to hold the state and its taxpayers hostage to their demands as taxpayers face the highest tax increase in the state’s history of $1.5 billion.

 

The end of collective bargaining in Wisconsin is in essence a transfer of power from Wisconsin State employee unions to those whom voters elected to state office.  Wisconsin’s Governor and State legislature now have the ability to manage their State’s finances and personnel to the benefit of Wisconsin taxpayers and the State as a whole. 

 

As the Governor of Wisconsin achieves success, Governor Malloy’s theme song of “Shared Sacrifices” was removed from the top 10 list and will not win a Grammy.

 

The Governor needs to start humming another tune as the nonpartisan State Office of Fiscal Analysis (OFA) in their report recently declared that they lack the information to verify the alleged savings in the state employee union contracts which Governor Malloy negotiated and is so anxious to have signed guaranteeing 4 years of job security and a 9% wage increase to state employees along with enviable health and pension benefits not found in the private sector.  News sources report that the OFA “can vouch for less than 40 percent of the $1.6 billion in labor savings figured into the next biennial budget, and are unable to assess the rest--more than $1 billion--because of unanswered questions or insufficient data.” 

 

Where Malloy’s budget is built on speculation, there is one guarantee - $1.5 billion in new state taxes are on their way and a substantial increase in property taxes could follow in a year or two.   

 

Where Malloy’s budget is built on speculation, State employee union contracts are legally binding documents!  With a lock on state union wages and job guarantees and the OFA’s inability to find the savings within the union contracts negotiated , Malloy’s limited resources could ultimately result in a cut to municipal aid and in turn an increase in property taxes.